Correlations of Random Binary Sequences with Pre-Stated Operator Intention: A Review of a 12-Year Program
Abstract
Strong correlations between output distribution means of a variety of random binary processes and pre-stated intentions of some 100 individual human operators have been established over a 12-year experimental program. More than 1000 experimental series, employing four different categories of random devices and several distinctive protocols, show comparable magnitudes of anomalous mean shifts from chance expectation, with similar distribution structures. Although the absolute effect sizes are quite small, of the order of 10−4 bits deviation per bit processed, over the huge databases accumulated, the composite effect exceeds 7σ (p ≈ 3.5 × 10−13). These data display significant disparities between female and male operator performances, and consistent serial position effects in individual and collective results. Data generated by operators far removed from the machines and exerting their efforts at times other than those of machine operation show similar effect sizes and structural details to those of the local, on-time experiments. Most other secondary parameters tested are found to have little effect on the scale and character of the results, with one important exception: studies performed using fully deterministic pseudorandom sources, either hard-wired or algorithmic, yield null overall mean shifts, and display no other anomalous features.
Journal of Scientific Exploration, 11, No. 3 (1997), reprinted with permission
This and the following article summarize the rigorous empirical justification on which the interpretations and applications offered throughout the remainder of this anthology are based, and are included for those readers wishing to judge for themselves the quality and extensiveness of the undergirding experimental data. The first, a summary of the human/machine portion of the work, was originally submitted to various segments of the Physical Review spectrum of journals in the hope of engaging more members of the physics community in similar research efforts. It was rejected, without any technical reviews, over a series of editorial appeals, on the ideological grounds that it was an “inappropriate” topic for that scholarly venue. It was subsequently dismissed a priori by the editorial board of Foundations of Physics. Ultimately, it was published intact by JSE, and has been widely referenced since its appearance.