Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing
Volume 3, Issue 3 , Pages 254-269 , May 2007

Information and Uncertainty in Remote Perception Research

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.

 This paper reviews the strategic history of our major experimental research component in remote perception, and attempts to distill from its large accumulation of data some phenomenological understanding to complement that achieved in the human/machine portion. From the outset of the PEAR program there were strong indications that both of these extraordinary capacities of consciousness draw from the same ontological well, i.e., in one case consciousness is apparently extracting information from random sources by anomalous means; in the other, it is evidently inserting it. In the human/machine case, however, quantitative specification of the anomalous effect size is inherent in the output of the machines. In the remote perception investigations, quantification of effects becomes the central challenge and, as described this article, has dominated the research effort, eventually leading to profound insights into the basic nature of the phenomenon.

PII: S1550-8307(07)00063-8

doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2007.03.010

Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing
Volume 3, Issue 3 , Pages 254-269 , May 2007