Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing
Volume 4, Issue 6 , Pages 368-373, November 2008

Hitting the Target: Why Existing Measures of “Religiousness” Are Really Reverse-Scored Measures of “Secularism”

  • Daniel E. Hall, MD, MDiv, MHSc

      Affiliations

    • Center for Health Equities Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA
    • Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding Author. Address: Suite F 1206 Presbyterian, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
  • ,
  • Harold G. Koenig, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
  • ,
  • Keith G. Meador, MD, ThM, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
    • Department of Pastoral Theology, Duke Divinity School, Durham, NC

Over 100 measures of religiousness and spirituality are used in research investigating the associations between religion and health. These measures are often used to assess “religiousness in general,” but this approach lumps together widely divergent worldviews in ways that can distort religion beyond recognition. The authors suggest that the existing measures of religiousness are perhaps better understood as reverse-coded measures of “secularism.” This argument suggests that the existing data regarding religiousness and health might be best interpreted as demonstrating a small, robust health liability associated with a deliberately secular worldview. If true, this conclusion might change the direction of future research, and it would imply that meaningful inferences about the health associations of religious practice will depend on developing tools that measure specific religions in their particularity.

Key words: Religion, spirituality, measurement, precision, health

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This work has been supported in part by grant JTF 2065 from the John Templeton Foundation (Hall and Koenig).

PII: S1550-8307(08)00221-8

doi:10.1016/j.explore.2008.08.002

Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing
Volume 4, Issue 6 , Pages 368-373, November 2008