Volume 5, Issue 2 , Pages 97-103, March 2009
Unique Aspects of Herbal Whole System Research
Introduction
Whole systems of healthcare offer unique methodological and theoretical challenges for researchers. Herbalism has its own set of methodological and philosophical research issues that are beyond those presented for whole system research in general. It was our objective to explore various conceptual and methodological issues surrounding whole system herbal research.
Methods
An International Society for Complementary Medicine Research workshop, Challenges in Herbal Whole System Research, was presented. Starting from a definition of herbalism, the most important challenges to herbal whole system research were elicited with inputs from both the workshop presenters and the audience.
Results
Five major challenges unique to herbal whole system research were identified: (1) defining herbalists and herbalism, (2) the role of the natural products industry in herbal research, (3) designing placebos and delivering active herbal treatments as given by herbalists, (4) researching the herb as a living entity, and (5) designing trials to investigate and develop multicomponent herbal therapies.
Conclusions
Unique methods and theoretical frameworks are required to design studies of herbalism. Solutions to these methodological challenges need to be addressed to conduct research that examines herbal systems of medicine versus conducting trials on individual herbs given out of their original therapeutic context.
Key words: Whole systems, herbalism, research methodology
To access this article, please choose from the options below
This research has been partially supported by National Cancer Institute (NCI) grant P50 CA 101451 and K07 CA102592 awarded to Dr Zick; NIDA grants R21 DA 019800, P50 DA 10075, and K02 DA 15674 awarded to Dr Chakraborty; and CIHR personnel awarded to Dr Hirschkorn. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or preparation, review or approval of the manuscript.
PII: S1550-8307(08)00382-0
doi:10.1016/j.explore.2008.12.001
© 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 5, Issue 2 , Pages 97-103, March 2009
